Fat and Happy Hillel Schwartz Critique

In ? blubber and Happy??, Hillel Schwartz is examining the bloods over corpulency and the lastingness of its treatments. Schwartz mortifyingly asks in his article, that a exposit alliance would be a desirable culture to live in. He uses biased considerations and wild reading to back his views a get inst the overweight society. He does state around teaching that is def curiosityed by evidence just now more of his statements require get on confirmation. Schwartz comports his readers? opinions over the causes of obesity and the power of its cures using reproducible fallacies and face-to-face attitudes. Schwartz claims that members of the society who argon in practiced physical grade atomic number 18 the cause of unhappiness among rotund lot. He says that by labeling orotund people as clowns, domiciliatenibals, and clodhoppers, they are causing more(prenominal) shame and abasement than an cogent individual would experience from worldness overweight al angi otensin-converting enzyme. People that stain comments such as, ?To be blubber is the end of life? (Schwartz 380), simply make them more miserable. These are all accurate points that Schwartz makes but most would consider this manifest logic. One of the logical fallacies Schwartz uses is overhasty generalization. Schwartz claims that overweight people are not able to surmount in school and/or in their careers. The writer has no evidence that overweight people are unable to execute well in these areas but blindly accuses them as beingness unsuccessful. Schwartz also uses false simile in his case when he affirms that minorities and obese people are similar. He argues those both minorities and obese people have b early(a) being promoted in the body of work and being accepted to colleges. This is not a logical argument because minorities have been known to commit high positions in legion(predicate) occupations and on that point are immeasurable scholarships sponsoring minor ity students to attend colleges nationwide. ! An other(a) one of the author?s arguments states that obese patients? have no other option other than burning their own body fat and in turn, being cannibalistic (Schwartz 386). This statement is not logical because there is no solid proof that this is the only path to stomach weight. diet does not mean your body is ? take itself up? as the author portrays it; diet is actually regularization the amount and types of provender you ingest in lay out to gain or stick out weight. There are also functional procedures and therapeutic treatments that could palliate a patient trying lose weight. Therefore, dieting or ?cannibalism? is not the only option for an obese person, which makes Schwartz?s? argument illogical. Schwartz?s answer to a pang humiliated obese population is to make everyone overweight. He believes that if everyone were fat, obesity would not be referred to as a minority. The labeling and name-calling would come to a halt and slight discrimination would occur.

The society would prefer the good as fence to the bad. In his argument, Schwartz uses Non Sequitur to provide reason bottomland his estimation. He refers to the end of the use of drugs, greed, and patriarchy (Schwartz 385). Schwartz believes that all of these problems would be solved if we lived in a purely obese society but his claim lacks logic because there is no sanction that people would not use drugs and women would become the dominate sex. Hillel Schwartz is clear critical of dieting and the obese population; he has numerous logical as well as illogical arguments. such(prenominal) of the evidence Schwartz pr ovides has diminished efficiency in proving his poin! t because argue defense can be found. He uses many of his personal opinions to help sway the readers view. His idea of an all-fat society does not front logical collectible to projected consequences such as health risks and inefficiency. The writer overlooks many of these costs when trying to support his idea of making a common obese society. Criticizing the current treatments for obesity and weight divergence is not going to justify Schwartz?s views and opinions. Works CitedSchwartz, Hillel. Fat and Happy? Writing and Reading crossways the Curriculum. ByLeonard J. Rosen and Laurence Behrens. New York: Longman, 2006. 380-86. If you ask to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay